CPT 90785 is one of the most underutilized codes in mental health billing, yet it represents legitimate revenue for the complex work therapists do every day. This add-on code captures the additional time and skill required when sessions involve communication difficulties, emotional dysregulation, third-party involvement, or the need for protective measures.
The challenge? Many therapists either skip billing 90785 entirely (leaving money on the table) or use it incorrectly (triggering audits and recoupments). This guide gives you everything you need to bill interactive complexity confidently and correctly.
What Is CPT 90785?
CPT 90785 is an add-on code that recognizes the additional complexity involved in certain psychotherapy and psychiatric evaluation sessions. The American Medical Association defines this code as:
"Interactive complexity (List separately in addition to the code for primary procedure)"
This code captures the extra work required when specific complicating factors are present during a psychiatric service.
Unlike time-based psychotherapy codes (90832, 90834, 90837), interactive complexity is not about session duration. Instead, it reflects the presence of specific factors that make the therapeutic work more demanding. You can provide a 30-minute session that qualifies for 90785, or a 60-minute session that does not qualify, depending on what happens during that session.
Key Facts About 90785
- Code Type: Add-on code (cannot be billed alone)
- Qualifying Requirement: At least one of four specific factors must be present
- Frequency: Used in approximately 8-12% of psychotherapy claims nationally
- Documentation: Requires explicit documentation of qualifying factor(s)
- Audit Risk: One of the most frequently audited mental health add-on codes
- Payer Coverage: Covered by Medicare and most commercial insurers when properly documented
Add-On Code Requirements
As an add-on code, 90785 must always be billed alongside a primary psychiatric service. You cannot bill 90785 by itself. Here are the base codes that 90785 can be added to:
| Base Code | Description | 90785 Allowed? |
|---|---|---|
| 90791 | Psychiatric diagnostic evaluation | Yes |
| 90792 | Psychiatric diagnostic evaluation with medical services | Yes |
| 90832 | Psychotherapy, 30 minutes (16-37 min) | Yes |
| 90834 | Psychotherapy, 45 minutes (38-52 min) | Yes |
| 90837 | Psychotherapy, 60 minutes (53+ min) | Yes |
| 90833 | Psychotherapy add-on to E/M, 30 min | Yes |
| 90836 | Psychotherapy add-on to E/M, 45 min | Yes |
| 90838 | Psychotherapy add-on to E/M, 60 min | Yes |
| 90846 | Family psychotherapy without patient | No |
| 90847 | Family psychotherapy with patient | No |
| 90853 | Group psychotherapy | No |
Important Limitation
90785 cannot be added to family therapy codes (90846, 90847) or group therapy (90853). This is a common billing error. The code is designed for individual psychiatric evaluations and individual psychotherapy sessions only.
The 4 Qualifying Factors for Interactive Complexity
To bill 90785, at least one of the following four factors must be present during the session. These are not optional considerations. You must be able to document that one or more of these specific situations occurred.
Communication Difficulties
The need to manage maladaptive communication among participants that complicates the delivery of care.
Qualifying Examples:
- Patient with severe social anxiety who struggles to verbalize thoughts
- Highly tangential speech requiring constant redirection
- Patient who shuts down or dissociates when discussing certain topics
- Language or cultural barriers affecting therapeutic communication
- Cognitive impairment affecting ability to engage in standard dialogue
Caregiver Emotions or Behavior
Caregiver emotions or behavior that interferes with implementation of the treatment plan.
Qualifying Examples:
- Parent who undermines therapeutic recommendations
- Spouse who dismisses patient's mental health needs
- Caregiver experiencing their own mental health crisis
- Family member who dominates session or speaks for patient
- Guardian with conflicting views about treatment approach
Discussion of Third-Party Information
Evidence or discussion of a sentinel event or other patient disclosure that requires discussion of mandated reporting, threat assessment, or similar complex considerations.
Qualifying Examples:
- Disclosure of child abuse requiring mandatory reporting discussion
- Revelation of domestic violence and safety planning
- Suicidal or homicidal ideation requiring threat assessment
- Elder abuse disclosure and reporting obligations
- Discussion of duty to warn regarding specific threats
Use of Play Equipment or Interpreters
The need for the provider to use play equipment, physical devices, interpreter, or translator to communicate with the patient.
Qualifying Examples:
- Play therapy with young children using toys, art, or sand tray
- Use of sign language interpreter for deaf patient
- Foreign language interpreter facilitating session
- Augmentative communication devices for nonverbal patients
- Art therapy materials to facilitate expression in trauma work
Qualifying vs. Non-Qualifying Factors
One of the biggest sources of 90785 denials is billing for situations that feel complex but do not meet the specific criteria. Here is a clear comparison:
Qualifies for 90785
- ✓ Patient dissociates during trauma discussion, requiring grounding techniques
- ✓ Using Spanish interpreter for monolingual patient
- ✓ Mother becomes hostile when discussing her role in child's anxiety
- ✓ Child discloses physical abuse, requiring mandatory reporting discussion
- ✓ Using play therapy techniques with 5-year-old patient
- ✓ Patient with autism requires AAC device to communicate
- ✓ Conducting threat assessment after patient mentions harming coworker
Does NOT Qualify for 90785
- ✗ Patient has complex diagnostic picture (multiple diagnoses)
- ✗ Session is emotionally intense but communication is normal
- ✗ Patient is resistant to treatment but engages in dialogue
- ✗ Discussing difficult topics (grief, trauma) without communication barrier
- ✗ Family member is present but supportive and non-interfering
- ✗ Patient has personality disorder (complexity alone is not enough)
- ✗ Session runs longer than expected
The Key Distinction
A session being "difficult" or "complex" is not enough. The complexity must fit into one of the four specific categories. A patient with borderline personality disorder may have complex sessions, but 90785 only applies when specific qualifying factors (communication difficulties, caregiver interference, sentinel events, or equipment/interpreter use) are documented.
Documentation Requirements
Proper documentation is your shield against audits and denials. For 90785, your notes must clearly establish which qualifying factor was present and how it affected the session.
90785 Documentation Checklist
Sample Documentation Language
Example 1: Communication Difficulties
"Interactive complexity present: Patient exhibited significant communication difficulties throughout the session, becoming nonverbal for approximately 15 minutes when discussing recent trauma exposure. Required use of written communication and grounding techniques to re-establish therapeutic dialogue. This maladaptive communication pattern complicated the delivery of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy interventions and necessitated modified approaches to maintain therapeutic engagement."
Example 2: Caregiver Interference
"Interactive complexity present: Mother (caregiver) present for portion of session and demonstrated behavior that interfered with treatment implementation. Caregiver repeatedly contradicted patient's statements about symptom severity, expressed skepticism about medication benefits, and stated she 'doesn't believe in therapy.' Significant session time devoted to psychoeducation with caregiver and addressing her resistance to support treatment adherence outside of sessions."
Example 3: Sentinel Event/Mandatory Reporting
"Interactive complexity present: Patient disclosed during session that her partner struck their 8-year-old daughter last night, leaving visible bruising. This disclosure required detailed discussion of mandatory reporting obligations, explanation of child protective services process, and safety planning for both patient and child. Threat assessment conducted regarding ongoing risk. Filed CPS report #12345 following session. Treatment plan adjusted to prioritize domestic violence safety planning."
Example 4: Interpreter/Equipment Use
"Interactive complexity present: Session conducted with certified ASL interpreter to facilitate communication with deaf patient. The use of interpreter required modified pacing of therapeutic interventions and necessitated additional clarification of nuanced emotional concepts. Extra time devoted to ensuring accurate translation of CBT concepts and confirming patient comprehension of between-session assignments through interpreter."
Medicare vs. Commercial Reimbursement Rates
As an add-on code, 90785 provides incremental revenue on top of your base psychotherapy or evaluation code. The reimbursement is modest but meaningful, especially when you bill it appropriately for qualifying sessions.
2024-2025 Medicare Rates
Commercial Insurance Rates
Commercial payers typically reimburse 110-150% of Medicare rates for 90785:
- Blue Cross Blue Shield: $18-28 average
- Aetna: $16-24 average
- United Healthcare: $17-25 average
- Cigna: $15-22 average
Combined Billing Examples
| Base Code | Base Rate | + 90785 | Combined Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90791 (Eval) | $172.52 | $15.92 | $188.44 |
| 90834 (45 min) | $102.09 | $15.92 | $118.01 |
| 90837 (60 min) | $152.16 | $15.92 | $168.08 |
Revenue Impact Over Time
If you see 100 patients per month and 15% of sessions legitimately qualify for 90785, that is an additional $239 per month in Medicare revenue (or approximately $360 per month with commercial payers). Over a year, that represents $2,800 to $4,300 in additional revenue for work you are already doing.
Common Qualifying Scenarios
Here are real-world clinical situations where 90785 is appropriate. Use these as a reference, but always document the specific circumstances of each session.
Child Therapy with Play Techniques
When providing psychotherapy to young children (typically under 10), the use of play therapy techniques, sand tray, puppets, or art materials qualifies for 90785. The child's developmental level requires non-verbal communication methods.
Factor: Use of play equipment to communicate
Trauma Processing with Dissociation
Patient dissociates during trauma work, becoming nonverbal or presenting with altered states. The therapist must use grounding techniques, modified communication approaches, and careful pacing to maintain therapeutic connection.
Factor: Maladaptive communication complicating care
Interpreter-Assisted Sessions
Sessions conducted with an ASL interpreter or foreign language interpreter. The presence of an interpreter changes session dynamics, pacing, and requires additional verification of comprehension.
Factor: Need for interpreter/translator
Safety Assessment After Disclosure
Patient discloses suicidal ideation with specific plan, domestic violence, child abuse, or threats toward others. Session requires threat assessment, safety planning, and discussion of mandatory reporting or duty to warn obligations.
Factor: Sentinel event requiring threat assessment
Difficult Caregiver Dynamics
Parent, spouse, or guardian present in session who actively undermines treatment, contradicts patient, becomes emotionally dysregulated, or expresses hostility toward the therapeutic process.
Factor: Caregiver behavior interfering with treatment
Autism Spectrum with Communication Challenges
Patient on the autism spectrum who requires augmentative communication devices, visual supports, or whose communication style requires significant adaptation of standard therapeutic techniques.
Factor: Physical devices needed for communication
Payer-Specific Rules and Limitations
While 90785 is widely recognized, payers have varying policies that affect coverage and documentation requirements.
| Payer | Coverage | Special Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Medicare | Covered | Requires clear documentation of qualifying factor. Subject to medical review. |
| Medicaid | Varies by state | Some states cover, others do not. Check state-specific fee schedules. |
| BCBS | Generally covered | May request documentation on audit. Some plans limit frequency. |
| United Healthcare | Covered | Documentation must specify qualifying factor. Frequent use triggers review. |
| Aetna | Covered | Standard documentation requirements. May deny if factor not clearly stated. |
| Cigna | Covered | Requires documentation. May limit to certain provider types. |
| Tricare | Covered | Follows Medicare guidelines. Documentation of factor required. |
Verification Recommendation
Before routinely billing 90785 with a specific payer, verify coverage by checking their provider manual or calling provider services. Some managed care plans carved out from major insurers may have different policies than the parent company.
Audit Risk and Prevention
90785 is one of the more frequently audited add-on codes in mental health billing. Payers flag this code because it is sometimes used incorrectly or without adequate documentation. Here is how to protect yourself:
Audit Red Flags
- High frequency: Billing 90785 on more than 30-40% of claims triggers review
- Pattern billing: Adding 90785 to every session for certain patients
- Vague documentation: Notes that say "complex session" without specifics
- Inconsistent factors: Claiming different qualifying factors each session without clinical rationale
- Billing with family therapy: Adding 90785 to 90846 or 90847 (not allowed)
Audit Prevention Strategies
Be Selective
Only bill 90785 when a qualifying factor is genuinely present. If you are adding it to most sessions, you are likely overbilling.
Document the Factor Explicitly
Name the specific qualifying factor in your note. Do not make auditors guess which category applies.
Describe the Impact
Explain how the factor complicated the delivery of care. The connection between factor and clinical impact must be clear.
Avoid Routine Use
Even if a patient consistently presents with qualifying factors, avoid adding 90785 to every single session. Bill it when the factor was clinically significant that day.
Review Your Patterns
Periodically audit your own billing. If 90785 appears on more than 20-25% of your claims, review whether all uses are truly justified.
Common Denial Reasons and Appeals
When 90785 claims are denied, it is usually for one of these reasons. Understanding the denial allows you to appeal effectively or prevent future denials.
| Denial Reason | What It Means | How to Respond |
|---|---|---|
| "Documentation does not support" | The note did not clearly identify a qualifying factor | Submit appeal with highlighted documentation showing the factor |
| "Not medically necessary" | The complexity described did not meet criteria | Provide additional context about clinical impact |
| "Incorrect code combination" | 90785 was billed with an incompatible base code | Verify base code is allowed; correct and resubmit if error |
| "Frequency limitation exceeded" | Payer has policy limiting how often 90785 can be billed | Appeal with clinical justification for each instance |
| "Service not covered" | This payer/plan does not cover 90785 | Verify coverage; if confirmed not covered, cannot appeal |
Effective Appeal Language
"I am appealing the denial of CPT 90785 for date of service [DATE]. The attached clinical documentation clearly demonstrates the presence of [QUALIFYING FACTOR]. Specifically, [DESCRIBE THE FACTOR AND ITS MANIFESTATION]. This factor significantly complicated the delivery of psychotherapy services, requiring [DESCRIBE YOUR CLINICAL RESPONSE]. Per CPT guidelines, interactive complexity (90785) is appropriate when any of the four qualifying factors are present. The documentation supports medical necessity for this add-on code."
Real-World Billing Scenarios
Let us walk through specific clinical situations to clarify when 90785 does and does not apply:
Scenario A: Appropriate Use with Play Therapy
Situation: A therapist provides a 45-minute session with a 6-year-old patient using sand tray therapy, puppets, and drawing to address separation anxiety. The child's developmental level requires these non-verbal communication methods.
Correct Billing: 90834 + 90785
Rationale: The use of play equipment to communicate with the child meets Factor 4 (physical devices/equipment needed for communication). Document the specific materials used and why verbal-only therapy would not be effective.
Scenario B: Appropriate Use with Caregiver Interference
Situation: During a session with an adolescent patient, the mother insists on staying in the room and repeatedly interrupts to contradict the patient's statements, minimize symptoms, and question the value of therapy. The therapist spends significant time managing the mother's behavior.
Correct Billing: 90834 + 90785 (or 90837 + 90785 depending on time)
Rationale: The caregiver's behavior is interfering with treatment implementation (Factor 2). Document specific examples of interference and how you addressed it.
Scenario C: Inappropriate Use
Situation: A patient with borderline personality disorder has an emotionally intense session discussing relationship difficulties. The session is challenging but the patient communicates clearly, no third parties are involved, no sentinel events occur, and no special equipment is needed.
Correct Billing: 90834 or 90837 alone (no 90785)
Rationale: While the session was complex, none of the four qualifying factors were present. Emotional intensity alone does not justify 90785.
Scenario D: Appropriate Use with Mandatory Reporting
Situation: During a session, an adult patient discloses that she witnessed her neighbor physically abusing their child. The therapist must discuss mandatory reporting obligations, explain the CPS process, and conduct a safety assessment regarding any risk to the patient for making the report.
Correct Billing: 90834 + 90785
Rationale: The disclosure of a sentinel event (child abuse) requiring discussion of mandatory reporting meets Factor 3. Document the disclosure, your threat assessment, and the reporting discussion.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I bill 90785 for every session with a child using play therapy? ▼
While play therapy technically qualifies under Factor 4, billing 90785 for every single session may trigger audits. Best practice is to bill it when the play-based communication is a significant factor in the session, not as a routine add-on. If a child occasionally engages in verbal-only dialogue, that session may not warrant 90785. Document specifically when and why play equipment was clinically necessary.
Does using telehealth count as a "physical device" for Factor 4? ▼
No. The use of standard telehealth technology (computer, tablet, video platform) does not qualify for 90785. Factor 4 refers to augmentative communication devices, interpreters, or play equipment needed because of the patient's communication limitations. If a deaf patient uses video relay service with an interpreter during telehealth, that would qualify. The telehealth platform itself does not.
Can I bill 90785 if the patient mentions suicidal thoughts? ▼
It depends on the clinical response required. Passive suicidal ideation that is briefly assessed and addressed may not rise to Factor 3 level. However, if the disclosure requires a formal threat assessment, safety planning, discussion of hospitalization, or coordination with emergency services, then 90785 is appropriate. Document the specific assessment conducted and actions taken.
Can multiple qualifying factors be present in one session? ▼
Yes, multiple factors can be present, but you still only bill 90785 once per session. You cannot add 90785 multiple times for multiple factors. However, documenting multiple factors strengthens your support for billing the code and may be helpful if audited.
Is 90785 billable for initial evaluations (90791)? ▼
Yes, 90785 can be added to psychiatric diagnostic evaluations (90791 and 90792) when qualifying factors are present. For example, if you conduct an evaluation with an interpreter or if the patient's parent exhibits behavior that complicates the evaluation process, 90785 is appropriate.
What if the interpreter is provided by phone rather than in person? ▼
The modality of the interpreter (in-person, video, or phone) does not change whether 90785 applies. What matters is that an interpreter was necessary to facilitate communication with the patient. A phone interpreter for a patient who speaks only Spanish qualifies under Factor 4 just as an in-person interpreter would.
How do I document Factor 1 without being subjective? ▼
Focus on observable behaviors rather than interpretations. Instead of writing "patient was difficult to engage," write "patient became nonverbal for approximately 10 minutes, requiring use of written communication and extended silences to maintain therapeutic connection." Describe what happened, how long it lasted, and what you did to address it. Specificity is key.
Key Takeaways
Master CPT 90785 Billing
CPT 90785 exists to recognize the additional clinical skill and effort required when specific complicating factors are present in psychiatric services. When used correctly, it captures legitimate revenue for complex work you are already doing. When used incorrectly, it exposes your practice to audit risk and recoupments.
The key is selectivity and documentation. Not every challenging session qualifies, but many therapists underutilize this code for sessions that genuinely meet criteria. Review your caseload, identify patients and situations where qualifying factors regularly occur, and ensure your documentation supports billing when appropriate.
Found this helpful?
Share it with your colleagues
TheraFocus Team
Practice Management Experts
The TheraFocus team is dedicated to empowering therapy practices with cutting-edge technology, expert guidance, and actionable insights on practice management, compliance, and clinical excellence.